All Resources

2013 flood recovery erosion control program : program guide document

Description

The 2013 Flood Recovery Erosion Control (FREC) Program was originally designed to fund these critical projects and other erosion control priorities arising as a result of the 2013 flood events.... More ≫

Description

The 2013 Flood Recovery Erosion Control (FREC) Program was originally designed to fund these critical projects and other erosion control priorities arising as a result of the 2013 flood events. The program has since been expanded to include some local flood control and community mitigation projects and additional funding (a total of $116 million) has been allocated to the program. The focus of the program remains on projects that can be completed by 2015. It is acknowledged that additional and more extensive recommendations on community flood mitigation may be forthcoming from the Premier's Advisory Panel and that there is likely a need for an on-going community mitigation program. It is also acknowledged that pre-existing erosion control infrastructure continues to be eligible for compensation under the existing Disaster Recovery Program (DRP).

Tags

Fort Vermilion - Peace River - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates the flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along an approximately 26 km reach of the Peace River through Fort Vermilion. The design discharge for the Peace... More ≫

Description

This study delineates the flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along an approximately 26 km reach of the Peace River through Fort Vermilion. The design discharge for the Peace River is 12640 m³/s. The study was prepared in July 2000. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Manning - Notikewin River - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 8 km reach of the Notikewin River through Manning. The design discharge for the Notikewin River is 2590... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 8 km reach of the Notikewin River through Manning. The design discharge for the Notikewin River is 2590 m³/s. The study was prepared in July 2000. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Lamont - Lamont Creek and Tributaries - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along Lamont Creek and two unnamed tributaries through Lamont. The study area includes an approximate 6 km reach of... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along Lamont Creek and two unnamed tributaries through Lamont. The study area includes an approximate 6 km reach of Lamont Creek and almost 3 km of combined tributary stream length. The design discharge for Lamont Creek ranges from 11.2 m³/s at the upstream study extent to 16.6 m³/s at the downstream extent, with the design discharge through Lamont between 12.7 m³/s and 13.0 m³/s. The design discharges for the upstream and downstream tributaries are 1.5 m³/s and 5.4 m³/s respectively. The study was prepared in March 1998. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Rochester - Tawatinaw River - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 6 km reach of the Tawatinaw River through Rochester. The design discharge for the Tawatinaw River is 49.5... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 6 km reach of the Tawatinaw River through Rochester. The design discharge for the Tawatinaw River is 49.5 m³/s. The study was prepared in April 1997. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Sundre - Red Deer River and Bearberry Creek - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along the Red Deer River and Bearberry Creek through Sundre. The study area includes an approximate 9 km reach of the... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along the Red Deer River and Bearberry Creek through Sundre. The study area includes an approximate 9 km reach of the Red Deer River and an approximate 7 km reach of Bearberry Creek. The design discharge for the Red Deer River is 1080 m³/s. The design discharge for Bearberry Creek is 145 m³/s. The study was prepared in January 1997. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Sangudo - Pembina River - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 6 km reach of the Pembina River through Sangudo. The design discharge for the Pembina River is 1270 m³/s.... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines flood levels along an approximate 6 km reach of the Pembina River through Sangudo. The design discharge for the Pembina River is 1270 m³/s. The study was prepared in September 1996. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Watino - Smoky River - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along an approximate 8 km reach of the Smoky River through Watino and surrounding area. The design discharge for the... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along an approximate 8 km reach of the Smoky River through Watino and surrounding area. The design discharge for the Smoky River is 12700 m³/s. The study was prepared in July 1996. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Lacombe - Wolf Creek and Tributary - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along Wolf Creek and an unnamed tributary through Lacombe. The study area includes an almost 9 km reach of Wolf Creek... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along Wolf Creek and an unnamed tributary through Lacombe. The study area includes an almost 9 km reach of Wolf Creek and approximate 2 km of tributary stream length. The design discharge for Wolf Creek is 36.4 m³/s downstream of Highway 2, 40.1 m³/s upstream Highway 2 and at Highway 2A and 29.7 m³/s upstream of Highway 12. The design discharge of the tributary is 13.3 m³/s. The study was prepared in June 1996. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags

Bighorn (MD) and Exshaw - Bow River and Exshaw Creek - flood hazard study

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along the Bow River and Exshaw Creek through Municipal District of Bighorn, including Exshaw. The study area includes an... More ≫

Description

This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along the Bow River and Exshaw Creek through Municipal District of Bighorn, including Exshaw. The study area includes an approximate 15 km reach of the Bow River and an approximate 1 km reach of Exshaw Creek. The design discharge for the Bow River ranges from 728 m³/s at the upstream study extent to 762 m³/s at the downstream extent. The design discharge for Exshaw Creek is 14.3 m³/s. The study was prepared in February 1996. Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping.

Tags