All Resources

AgriProfit$ business analysis & research program for Alberta beef producers

Description

Describes the purpose and activities of Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development's AgriProfit$ program. The program regularly publishes a variety of economic and financial benchmarks, tools and... More ≫

Description

Describes the purpose and activities of Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development's AgriProfit$ program. The program regularly publishes a variety of economic and financial benchmarks, tools and applied research materials for agriculture industry clients.

Tags

AgriProfit$ : newsletter for Alberta cattlemen

Description

Provides Alberta beef producers with timely information, analysis, applied research and commentary on the economics and business management of cow/calf operations. Articles focus on information... More ≫

Description

Provides Alberta beef producers with timely information, analysis, applied research and commentary on the economics and business management of cow/calf operations. Articles focus on information and discussions on how to improve your herd's bottom line. Each edition contains a feature article exploring an issue in-depth, a Market Watch section providing market information and analysis, notes on upcoming events, and a So What …? column designed to bring readers quickly into a topic, deliver a message, and leave them with some food for thought.

Tags

Economic, productive & financial performance of Alberta cow/calf operations : comparing Northern Alberta total, Northern Alberta low cost, and 5 year Northern Alberta low cost management groupings

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis,... More ≫

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis, comparing to one's own detailed business analysis, is the first critical step in identifying operational strengths and weaknesses in a cow/calf operation. The benchmarking process has two key time perspectives. The first is an historical analysis, involving comparisons over time. The second is a within-year comparison, focusing on how your operation performed, responded to, or weathered the challenges faced by you and your local peers.

Tags

Economic, productive & financial performance of Alberta cow/calf operations : comparing Central Alberta total, Central Alberta low cost, and 5 year Central Alberta low cost management groupings

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis,... More ≫

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis, comparing to one's own detailed business analysis, is the first critical step in identifying operational strengths and weaknesses in a cow/calf operation. The benchmarking process has two key time perspectives. The first is an historical analysis, involving comparisons over time. The second is a within-year comparison, focusing on how your operation performed, responded to, or weathered the challenges faced by you and your local peers.

Tags

Economic, productive & financial performance of Alberta cow/calf operations : comparing Southern Alberta total, Southern Alberta low cost, and 5 year Southern Alberta low cost management groupings

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis,... More ≫

Description

The primary value of these reports is to enable producers to gauge their productive, economic and financial performance relative to their peers locally and provincially. Benchmark analysis, comparing to one's own detailed business analysis, is the first critical step in identifying operational strengths and weaknesses in a cow/calf operation. The benchmarking process has two key time perspectives. The first is an historical analysis, involving comparisons over time. The second is a within-year comparison, focusing on how your operation performed, responded to, or weathered the challenges faced by you and your local peers.

Tags

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles. Dryland swath grazing : Central Alberta

Description

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone.... More ≫

Description

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These benchmark include AgriProfit$ field observations from the period of 2008 – 2010. Averaging over a 3 year span smooths out extremes in prices, yields and expenses. This gives a better reflection of the crops’ intermediate term costs and profit potential.

Tags

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles. Dryland tame grass pasture : Central Alberta

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These... More ≫

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These benchmark include field observations from the period 2008 to 2010. Averaging over a three-year span smooths out extremes in prices, yields and expenses and gives a better reflection of the crops’ intermediate term costs and profit potential.

Tags

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles. Dryland swath grazing : southern Alberta

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These... More ≫

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These benchmark include field observations from the period 2008 to 2010. Averaging over a three-year span smooths out extremes in prices, yields and expenses and gives a better reflection of the crops’ intermediate term costs and profit potential.

Tags

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles. Dryland tame/native mixed pasture : northern Alberta

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These... More ≫

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These benchmark include field observations from the period 2008 to 2010. Averaging over a three-year span smooths out extremes in prices, yields and expenses and gives a better reflection of the crops’ intermediate term costs and profit potential.

Tags

AgriProfit$ cost & returns profiles. Dryland tame/native mixed pasture : southern Alberta

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These... More ≫

Description

AgriProfit$ cost and returns profiles give an insight into the productive and economic performance of Alberta cereal, oilseed, forage and grazing crops, reported by soil or grass-type zone. These benchmark include field observations from the period 2008 to 2010. Averaging over a three-year span smooths out extremes in prices, yields and expenses and gives a better reflection of the crops’ intermediate term costs and profit potential.

Tags